The topic title will sound very absurd to you. Well yes this a li’l post about Microsoft’s upcoming OS, Vista. So is it really Vista or OS X Tiger’s cub? Here are a few things I would like to point out.
Firstly, I’d like to mention that the Vista Build 5259 screenshots are sourced from Activewin.com
Now let’s get down to the point.
For starters, have a look at this so-called “refreshing new” control panel interface of Vista.

Looks really good, doesn’t it? But look at this screenshot.

I am not talking about the GUI rip. That isn’t my point. My point is, why try to ape a menu style which is 5 years old? I mean even a layman will say that both the menus look damn similar. Except that one is 5 yrs old
Another thing I don’t appreciate is Microsoft’s adoption of “Metro” in “Avalon” their so-called answer to Adobe’s PDF but when more significantly put, Apple’s PDF-based Aqua.
My question is why.. why introduce another document format and create more confusion in the already saturated market? Why couldn’t Microsoft stay put with PDF. When they can take help of Adobe for developing their TrueType fonts.. why not adopt their PDF format?
The next thing I’d want to ask is, why are the system requirements so high for Vista? I know you’ll say that Vista hasn’t even released, but Microsoft has already acknowledged that Vista will require a DX-9 capable card(read a card worth lotsa cash).
Now people who spend a lot on hardware will say that such graphic cards are NOT that expensive. But, think of a consumer with limited budget. Why doesn’t Microsoft try to keep the system requirements for its operating systems down? Why do we always need to upgrade our systems to run their new OS(Win 95->98->XP->Vista?)
Now compare this to Tiger. Tiger is Apple’s OS which can be compared to Vista in features except that it is already in market since April 2005 and Vista will be around one and a half years late atleast. Tiger runs on a G3. Why can’t vista run on a P3 with on-board graphics?
You’ll point out that in such a case people shouldn’t upgrade to Vista and should continue to use XP. But Microsoft has ensured that there will be no WMP 11 for XP or there’ll be no DirectX 10. They didn’t even include “ClearType” technology for Windows 2000 just to get people to upgrade to Win 2003! To add to it, Windows 98/Me users were left in the lurch when WMP support was discontinued for them. Why does Microsoft just abandon the users of their previous OS just like that? Why can’t they offer atleast the basic security and technology updates?
I don’t want to ask anything else as it doesn’t matter much to the average user. What matters has already been mentioned here.
And did I mention that Leapord will be ready to roar when Vista launches?